ভারী বৃষ্টি ও ভারতের জলাধারের বাঁধ খুলে দেওয়াতে বাংলাদেশের বেশকিছু অঞ্চলে ভয়াবহ বন্যার সৃষ্টি হয়েছে। এমতাবস্থায় দেশের পরিস্থিতি খুবই ভয়াবহ। তাই এই ভয়াবহ সময়ে যারা ক্ষতিগ্রস্ত হয়েছেন তাদের সকলের পাশে সাহায্যের হাত বাড়িয়ে দেওয়া আমাদের একান্ত কর্তব্য। তাই যার পক্ষে যেভাবে সম্ভব বন্যায় ক্ষতিগ্রস্ত মানুষের পাশে দাঁড়ানোর জন্য অনুরোধ রইলো। এখন আসি পোস্টের মূল কথায়। দেশের প্রায় সব অঞ্চলই ভয়াবহ বন্যার পরিস্থিতি সৃষ্টির দ্বারপ্রান্তে। তবে এখন বেশকিছু অঞ্চল ভয়াবহ বন্যার কবলে পড়েছে। যার মধ্যে রয়েছে ফেনী, কুমিল্লা, নোয়াখালী, মৌলভীবাজার, খাগড়াছড়ি, হবিগঞ্জ ও ব্রাহ্মণবাড়িয়া। উক্ত অঞ্চলগুলির জন্য যোগাযোগ করার জন্য বাংলাদেশের সকল মোবাইল অপারেটরগুলি ফ্রি ইন্টারনেট ও মিনিট এর ব্যবস্থা করেছে। তো উক্ত ফ্রি ইন্টারনেট ও মিনিট নিতে করণীয়গুলো নিচ থেকে দেখে নিন। রবি: বাংলাদেশের মোবাইল অপারেটর রবি "সাম্প্রতিক বন্যায় দুর্গতদের পাশে আছি আমরা" স্লোগানের মাধ্যমে তারা জনপ্রতি সকলকে ফ্রিতে ২৫০ এমবি ইন্টারনেট ও ২০ মিনিট ফ্রি দেওয়ার সিদ্ধান্ত নিয়েছে। ইন্টারনেট: ২৫০ এমবি মিনিট: ২০ মিনিট মেয়াদ: ৩ দিন ডায়াল কোড: *...
Hey, I am Writer Yasin , and I am about to share how I send my buyer’s request proposal that compels prospective buyers to contact me asap. Enjoy the ride with me. First off, here is my format: Sample 1 “ Hi (POTENTIAL BUYER’S NAME), I am (YOUR USERNAME), a professional writer by occupation and a Digital Marketer. I noticed you already have some offers before you, so I am going to save you the time of having to read through my long offer write-up. Kindly take a few minutes to go through my profile, if you like what you see, you can contact me. I will professionally write a good sales copy for your marketing poster just as you described. I am not just good at what I do; I am great at it. Contact me if you need excellent work. We can negotiate on your budget and arrive at a compromise. Best regards.” Some few things you need to notice from the proposal above include: 1.0 I mentioned the potential buyer’s name. You can ask me why? Thank you for asking. Because everybody on earth has...
When Turco et al. (1983) and Carl Sagan (1983) warned the world about the climatic effects of a nuclear war, they pointed out that the amount of carbon stored in a large city was sufficient to release enough aerosols (smoke, soot and dust) to block sunlight over large regions, leading to a widespread failure of crops and thereby extensive starvation.
Current nuclear arsenals by the United States and Russia could inject 150 Teragram (Tg) (10⁹ kilogram) of soot from fires ignited by nuclear explosions into the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (Coupe et al., 2019), lasting for a period of 10 years or longer, followed by a period of intense radioactive radiation over large areas. Even a “limited” nuclear war, such as between India and Pakistan, would release enough aerosols to affect large regions, killing millions or billions through starvation. As stated by Robock et al., 2007): “The casualties from the direct effects of blast, radioactivity, and fires resulting from the massive use of nuclear weapons by the superpowers would be so catastrophic … the ensuing nuclear winter would produce famine for billions of people far from the target zones”.
By 2021, with a global arsenal of ~13.000 nuclear warheads, 90 percent of which held by Russia and the US, regional conflicts such as in the Ukraine and Taiwan threaten to spill world-wide. As the clock of the atomic scientists is set at 100 seconds to doomsday, the rising probability of an intended or inadvertent nuclear war, in the background of rising global warming, indicate an hour of truth for the species―a choice between the defence of life on Earth and global suicide.
While the inhabitants of the planet are preoccupied with the 24 hours news cycle, media hype, superlatives, a deadly Virus, economic issues and sport games, the hair-trigger nuclear gun loaded by the powers to be, east and west, are threatening all life on Earth.
A release of 5Tg (Tera-gram) of black carbon is modelled to lower the average global temperature by about 1.5°C (Robock et al. 2007), although over the continents cooling is likely to be more abrupt.
Figure 3.Robock et al. (2007): Time variation of global average net surface shortwave radiation, surface air temperature, and precipitation changes for the 5 Tg standard case. The global average precipitation in the control case is 3.0 mm/day, so the changes in years 2-4 represent a 9% global average reduction in precipitation. The precipitation recovers faster than the temperature, but both lag the forcing. For comparison the global average net surface shortwave forcing from a model simulation of the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption (Oman et al., 2005) is shown.
Inherent in nuclear war strategy is a “use them or lose them” approach, namely hitting the enemy’s air and missile launch pads before missiles can be launched, which amounts to a virtual guarantee many or most nuclear war heads are potentially used. With the estimated size of the global nuclear warheads inventory of many tens of thousands warheads (Figure 4) this guarantees a global catastrophe.
Such an extreme event would arrest global warming for a period of about 10 years or longer (Figures 2 and 3), possibly in part analogous to the consequences of a less abrupt flow of polar ice melt into the oceans, as modelled by Bronselaer et al. (2018) (Figure 5).
Figure 5. Model 2080–2100 meltwater-induced sea-air temperature anomalies relative to the standard RCP8.5 ensemble (Bronselaer et al., 2018), indicating marked cooling of parts of the southern oceans. Hatching indicates where the anomalies are not significant at the 95% level.
When Sagan and colleagues published their observations of a nuclear winter scenario as a warning to humanity, Sagan was painted as an “alarmist” by many, facing extensive criticism not just from pro-nuclear conservatives but also from scientists who resented him for leveraging his personal fame for advocating what some regarded as political views. A similar situation occurs nowadays with regard to the accelerating global warming and the nuclear threat, as confirmed by the warning by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
From the January 20, 2022 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists news release: While the past year offered glimmers of hope that humankind might reverse its march toward global catastrophe, the Doomsday Clock was set at just 100 seconds to midnight. The time is based on continuing and dangerous threats posed by nuclear weapons, climate change, disruptive technologies, and COVID-19. All of these factors were exacerbated by “a corrupted information ecosphere that undermines rational decision making.” The Doomsday Clock statement explains that the “decision does not, by any means, suggest that the international security situation has stabilized. On the contrary, the Clock remains the closest it has ever been to civilization-ending apocalypse because the world remains stuck in an extremely dangerous moment.”
Time is running out.
Andrew Glikson
A/Prof. Andrew Glikson
Earth and Paleo-climate scientist School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of New South Wales, Kensington NSW 2052 Australia
It seems there is something wrong with your internet connection. Please connect to the internet and start browsing again.
AdBlock Detected!
We have detected that you are using adblocking plugin in your browser. The revenue we earn by the advertisements is used to manage this website, we request you to whitelist our website in your adblocking plugin.
Site is Blocked
Sorry! This site is not available in your country.